Because again, if you read the article, it’s very likely true that private conversations were recorded due to accidental Siri activations. NOT that they are always listening. NOT that those conversations were being used to feed ads. So that’s not what they’re settling for.
Then why did they immediately settle lol
If it was just confirmation bias, it would take basically no effort to dismiss the issue in court
Because again, if you read the article, it’s very likely true that private conversations were recorded due to accidental Siri activations. NOT that they are always listening. NOT that those conversations were being used to feed ads. So that’s not what they’re settling for.
This is not the "hard evidence" we need (and would not be hard to get if it were happening in the way people think it does).
I don't use any voice assistants personally because I still have concerns (but not a belief)