What you describe is pretty much the deafault formular used in International Relations.
In regards to Eurocentrism, when you take the standards of a superpower and see if they are still relevant against states that hold power and systems of power themselves, it is a wedge in the old term. (Western) Europe was a natural ally and there is no equal successor.
The US isn't a superpower anymore.
mr america your fired
Wishful thinking.
Sure I listen to a random dude instead of:
scientific marxism
those international relation academics from my university
the people dunking on the US who wihtstand their occupation
If you can't project power and aren't able to force the European core into your wars you aren't a super power.
picks up a book on Scientific Marxism
See, right here. Chapter 9, page 423. The Zizek equation for Superpowerhood. America's dipped below the Omega coefficient, so it's not Super anymore.
How many layers of Eurocentrism are you on, my dude?
What you describe is pretty much the deafault formular used in International Relations.
In regards to Eurocentrism, when you take the standards of a superpower and see if they are still relevant against states that hold power and systems of power themselves, it is a wedge in the old term. (Western) Europe was a natural ally and there is no equal successor.