I'm still a baby leftist in the sense that I haven't done all the readings yet, but I'm trying to understand this thread. They're saying one of the orgs(PSL) is using opportunism to circumvent already active orgs taking the lead in an action (CJP). They're mentioning to reject the opportunistic org (PSL) and unify under the Palestinian led org(CJP).

I'm trying to understand if this is valid criticism, where one org should stop their action in favor of another who is leading the movement, or if this is just something sectarian bs, when one org believes all actions should be led and supported by that org and the others cosign in.

Also it should be mentioned that PSL seemed to have stepped back anyway so further discourse about them needing to step away is moot.

  • Idliketothinkimsmart@lemmygrad.ml
    ·
    11 months ago

    I would suggest you interact with them, and see if you think this is true. I'm in the PSL, but frankly, asking strangers on the internet won't give you a conclusive answer one way or the other. I don't feel the need to badmouth a coalition I don't know, the CJP, but what I can say is that the PSL has been consistent in it's support for Palestine and other liberation struggles. I don't know if CJP is a marxist org or not, but nonetheless, there's no reason to suggest that multiple actions/ events can't happen at the same time lol.