It's pretty much a soft funded arm of alphabet agencies, so good luck. Wikipedia can't get minor details of popular movies and foreign dishes right, if you expect them to get something more nuanced right or to stand in a way to not create divisions among the people, I've got a sweet deal on an teacup shaped satellite.
There's prolewiki.org by some folks at lemmygrad trying just that iirc. The peoples' wikipedia is probably the best way to go, make our teachers that knew it was shit back when it first launched proud.
It's pretty much a soft funded arm of alphabet agencies, so good luck. Wikipedia can't get minor details of popular movies and foreign dishes right, if you expect them to get something more nuanced right or to stand in a way to not create divisions among the people, I've got a sweet deal on an teacup shaped satellite.
Nothing is stopping us from simply copying the entirety of Wikipedia and editing it from there. I call it hexbearpedia.
There's prolewiki.org by some folks at lemmygrad trying just that iirc. The peoples' wikipedia is probably the best way to go, make our teachers that knew it was shit back when it first launched proud.
neat I'm gonna contribute
deleted by creator
google doesn't fund editors though, the wiki community hates the WMF (which takes googles money)
deleted by creator
oh I see