cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/8181688

undefined

  • GarbageShoot [he/him]
    ·
    1 year ago

    "The tankie was rude to me when I accused him of having an ideology of senseless murder, his rudeness proves we shouldn't have a political coalition"

      • GarbageShoot [he/him]
        ·
        1 year ago

        But we can't talk about the "murder" because then that's me being a debate bro, even as you tacitly admit to it being bullshit in the comments (Stalin not sending you enough bullets is not the same as shooting you, sorry!)

        • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          hexagon
          M
          ·
          1 year ago

          But we can’t talk about the “murder” because then that’s me being a debate bro

          Yes, why do you think I owe you a discussion? Y'all are a bunch of entitled motherfuckers. Just calle me a "radlib" in your dunk tank and it's good no?

          There's a reason why the term sealion exists.

          • GarbageShoot [he/him]
            ·
            1 year ago

            Owe, owe, owe. You keep using that word, but I don't think I have. My argument is not that you owe anything, it's that if we are to pretend you are acting in good-faith, then there must be a healthy way for disagreement to exist (see you model the opposite in your title, how those dang tankies hate dissent). What I dislike is parading around completely fatuous claims and treating objections as pathological.

            • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              hexagon
              M
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I fucking let you mother truckers run amok in my space to disagree like a bunch of toxic monkeys. If that's not leaving space for "healthy disagreement" I don't know what is!

              But that's not enough is it? No if you don't debate me specifically it's not enough.

              • GarbageShoot [he/him]
                ·
                1 year ago

                But you point to everything said as pathology and evidence of evil, and it's unclear that any other disagreeing responses would have been met more kindly.

                • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  hexagon
                  M
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  What? I don't point to "everything said". I pointed 2 things. Entitled sealions like you who didn't take no for an answer and just became a toxic af (as sealions are wont to do) and the hexbear mob which came here to support said sealions with harassment.

                  I don't trust tankies. I believe that they will betray anarchists in every revolution. Y'all attitude here hasn't helped. But I was perfectly capable of talking to you people like awoo who didn't try to sealion me.

                  But to just go on collective campaign of harassment because I don't trust y'all and dare to express this publicly and then tell me I'm being unreasonable in my reaction . Like what?

                    • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                      hexagon
                      M
                      ·
                      1 year ago

                      If this is the first time you've seen anarchists who don't trust ml tp not to betray them after a revolution, then you haven't seen met enough anarchists. I don't know what to tell you.

                      But to react to anarchists who express this like a sealion backed by a harassing mob is just an epic self own man.

                      • GarbageShoot [he/him]
                        ·
                        1 year ago

                        I've seen this bit before, literally maybe my first comment is how played-out this is.

                        But to react to anarchists who express this like a sealion backed by a harassing mob is just an epic self own man.

                        See, this is what I mean. "Epic self-own, broski" like, how could one disagree without that being your response?

                        • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                          hexagon
                          M
                          ·
                          1 year ago

                          Omg. Mate disagree all you want. Write a whole epic takedown for all I care. I haven't banned you. Just don't expect me to debate you.

                          My point is that your inability to accept I won't debate you on this and then your immediate turn to insults along with the rest of the hexbears is, let's say, not endearing.

                          • GarbageShoot [he/him]
                            ·
                            1 year ago

                            Why do you complain about insults when you say much worse shit than I ever did in the OP?

                              • ShimmeringKoi [comrade/them]
                                ·
                                1 year ago

                                You clearly care, or you wouldn't still be working to hard to convince everyone that you're actually laughing

                                • Draconic NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                                  ·
                                  1 year ago

                                  I think if db0 actually cared he would've defederated the instance from Hexbear like many others have due to your instance's tendency to post disruptive spam, engage in flame wars, and also allegedly sabotaging other instances.

                                  • ShimmeringKoi [comrade/them]
                                    ·
                                    edit-2
                                    1 year ago

                                    Every time someone gets mad at us, that telephone-generated list of supposed internet crimes gets longer. Spam and flame wars sure, that's just what you call it when communists are both outspoken and don't genuflect to liberal orthodoxy. But sabotage? That's a new one. Give it a year and I bet you'll start hearing about our WMDs too.