How does that even make sense? If he engaged in an insurrection the Constitution is pretty clear that he can't hold office. What kind of flip floppy bs ruling is this?
The kind of ruling you find in an undemocratic oligarchy that gives preferential treatment to the rich class
The kind of ruling you find in an undemocratic oligarchy that gives preferential treatment to the rich class
Honestly I'd expect them to just rule that he didn't engage in insurrection.