You know how some Catholics do all that weird shit with the saints and the ecstatic or hermetic monastic traditions, and pilgrimages and the bathing in holy waters near shrines to the Virgin Mary? That has a theological meaning at least as abstacted as a Thai monk tying a red string on you has to the Pali Canon.
That is only the surface level of the deep and bafflingly complex Catholic mystical tradition, one which bares certain similarities to Hindu or Buddhist traditions in its attempt at a direct experience of God/reality (which is in some sense the same thing in Catholicism) through contemplation and ritualistic affect.
Look up the works of Simone Weil, a based leftist, Catholic Mystic, and pretty knowledgeable about eastern traditions as well.
It's more that the parts you're uncomfortable with are kind of reliable techniques that will achieve certain insights or mindstates if you keep it connected to the theological base. The issue is when those techniques are mistaken for the actual substance of the religion by the practitioner (much like someone in the Golden Dawn who interprets "Do what thou will shall be the whole of the law" as "do whatever you want".)
That's not what Buddha says though (Or Catholicism.) Friends are great, Buddha and his followers had friends. Buddha says "Noble friends and companions are the whole of the holy life." Jesus exhorts people to peace, communion, and love at an individual as well as a collective level.
No, attachment isn't liking a thing, removing attachment is recognising the ultimate impermanence of the thing as an indivisible part of a changing, shifting, interconnected reality and accepting joyfully that inevitable change.
deleted by creator
You know how some Catholics do all that weird shit with the saints and the ecstatic or hermetic monastic traditions, and pilgrimages and the bathing in holy waters near shrines to the Virgin Mary? That has a theological meaning at least as abstacted as a Thai monk tying a red string on you has to the Pali Canon.
That is only the surface level of the deep and bafflingly complex Catholic mystical tradition, one which bares certain similarities to Hindu or Buddhist traditions in its attempt at a direct experience of God/reality (which is in some sense the same thing in Catholicism) through contemplation and ritualistic affect.
Look up the works of Simone Weil, a based leftist, Catholic Mystic, and pretty knowledgeable about eastern traditions as well.
deleted by creator
It's more that the parts you're uncomfortable with are kind of reliable techniques that will achieve certain insights or mindstates if you keep it connected to the theological base. The issue is when those techniques are mistaken for the actual substance of the religion by the practitioner (much like someone in the Golden Dawn who interprets "Do what thou will shall be the whole of the law" as "do whatever you want".)
deleted by creator
That's not what Buddha says though (Or Catholicism.) Friends are great, Buddha and his followers had friends. Buddha says "Noble friends and companions are the whole of the holy life." Jesus exhorts people to peace, communion, and love at an individual as well as a collective level.
deleted by creator
No, attachment isn't liking a thing, removing attachment is recognising the ultimate impermanence of the thing as an indivisible part of a changing, shifting, interconnected reality and accepting joyfully that inevitable change.
deleted by creator