Got into a heated discussion with a coworker over this. My stance is it was probably for the best it was demolished. The entire thing was a massive fire and disease hazard. Massive amounts of crime and unlicensed businesses too. Despite its reputation for a kind of tight knit anarchist type community, most of the stuff I've read seems to suggest triads and the HK police were largely running the place.
I hate forceful eviction as much as the next person here. What else could have been done? There was some compensation given to the residents, but I know some residents complained it wasn't enough.
My coworker's stance is the place should have remained as it was, without any sort of intervention whatsoever, despite being so hazardous.
How do y'all feel?
deleted by creator
Most democratic? When? Certainly not under the British.
They just strapped a voting system onto the colony before they left as a "fuck you" to China, and a dare to knock it down.
China: "Challenge accepted."
Not most democratic, most "free".
"Free" of course being whatever bullshit definition the Cato institute and Heritage Foundation define it to be. Usually just the freedom of billionaires to evade taxes and fuck the poor.