Some quotes:

In this context, there is value in reframing most meat consumption as analogous to not vaccinating, for it captures a critical point: meat is a major source of unjustified harms to global health.

For the duty to avoid most meat, common concerns include that it interferes with people’s taste preferences, health, cultural values, and economic welfare. Ultimately, all these concerns prove unpersuasive: satisfying taste preferences is not an essential need that justifies impermissible risks to others; diets with little or no meat provide health benefits; meat’s cultural significance deserves consideration but fails to mint permissions to impose impermissible risks on others; and vegetarian diets cost less.

Drunk driving rarely involves the intent to harm, yet we recognize a moral duty to avoid it. The same holds for actions contributing to unintentional collective harm whose individual risks are tougher to pinpoint. Take the emission of chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs). Individuals have a moral duty to avoid CFC emissions given their significant harms to the ozone layer, even if one person’s emissions have no measurable impact.

Also

https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/69/wr/mm6927e2.htm

Among 23 states reporting COVID-19 outbreaks in meat and poultry processing facilities, 16,233 cases in 239 facilities occurred, including 86 (0.5%) COVID-19–related deaths. Among cases with race/ethnicity reported, 87% occurred among racial or ethnic minorities

https://www.insurancejournal.com/news/international/2020/08/19/579547.htm

20% of Meat Plant Workers Infected with Covid in Large Exporter Brazil, Union Says

and that's just people working on meatpacking, not even who work at the feedlots