no clue, i don't live in california and god willing never will
however, it seems that the argument used by the plaintiff (which the judge agreed with) could potentially be extended to california's awb? this ruling only applies to magazines, but now that there's precedent it seems like someone could use the same argument about a full-featured ar. of course that would still be a whole new lawsuit
no clue, i don't live in california and god willing never will
however, it seems that the argument used by the plaintiff (which the judge agreed with) could potentially be extended to california's awb? this ruling only applies to magazines, but now that there's precedent it seems like someone could use the same argument about a full-featured ar. of course that would still be a whole new lawsuit