Suburbs are inherently less efficient than denser planning. Cost per person of basically all infrastructure and maintenance doubles or more compared to denser housing. Electricity lines, gas and water piper, paving roads, internet cables. All of these thing serve fewer people and inherently cost more.
What's your point? Literally nobody should ever have a yard?
Do you see how small and close together these homes are? These are the homes of workers. That some workers live in detached homes isn't the problem with the world - keep your eye on the ball.
Suburbs are inherently less efficient than denser planning. Cost per person of basically all infrastructure and maintenance doubles or more compared to denser housing. Electricity lines, gas and water piper, paving roads, internet cables. All of these thing serve fewer people and inherently cost more.
What's your point? Literally nobody should ever have a yard?
Do you see how small and close together these homes are? These are the homes of workers. That some workers live in detached homes isn't the problem with the world - keep your eye on the ball.
These are neither small nor close together? Are all your neighbours Mr Moneybags or smth lol
Honestly that is a problem that greatly contributed to the death of the American left.
I don't think anyone's saying it's the only or anywhere near the biggest problem with anything. But what do you think our eye should be on?