Hot take: if we can't have public transportation, self driving cars are the next best thing. Fuck Elon Musk but I hate driving and really don't want to do it, but because we have zero public transportation infrastructure we all pretty much have no choice.
Ice cold take. There will never be self driving cars deployed on mass scale, and expecting or depending on them to "fix" transportation is a masturbatory VC pipedream. The time and monetary costs to implement the infrastructure dwarfs the costs of any new public transit, the legislative hurdles are going to be glacial and inconsistently applied, and assuming the AI gets trained not to brake at every street lamp and these things reach retail, rides are not going to be available for anything less than a price inaccessible for 90% of people. If you think governments are slow to build new bus routes, what makes you think they're going to jump over backwards to make sure people can afford a glorified taxi?
Also - imagine the horrorshow if there was a "small" fire in an underground tunnel only designed for self driving electric cars. For "safety" - the cars might be forced powered down and doors would be force locked. And if people started breaking their windows to get out - they'd find that there's no walkaway to safety because - of course - they were supposed to stay in their cars.
And - oopsie - there's no way to get firetrucks and fire equipment to the fire. And even firemen on foot might not be able to get to it either. The small fire rages and it gets bigger and bigger and bigger.
Yes, of course. Trains good. I would take buses over self-driving cars. But if we just can't have that, we should have self driving cars that don't require a license. We're not there yet, but it really shouldn't be that far off.
Hot take: if we can't have public transportation, self driving cars are the next best thing. Fuck Elon Musk but I hate driving and really don't want to do it, but because we have zero public transportation infrastructure we all pretty much have no choice.
deleted by creator
Ice cold take. There will never be self driving cars deployed on mass scale, and expecting or depending on them to "fix" transportation is a masturbatory VC pipedream. The time and monetary costs to implement the infrastructure dwarfs the costs of any new public transit, the legislative hurdles are going to be glacial and inconsistently applied, and assuming the AI gets trained not to brake at every street lamp and these things reach retail, rides are not going to be available for anything less than a price inaccessible for 90% of people. If you think governments are slow to build new bus routes, what makes you think they're going to jump over backwards to make sure people can afford a glorified taxi?
Also - imagine the horrorshow if there was a "small" fire in an underground tunnel only designed for self driving electric cars. For "safety" - the cars might be forced powered down and doors would be force locked. And if people started breaking their windows to get out - they'd find that there's no walkaway to safety because - of course - they were supposed to stay in their cars.
And - oopsie - there's no way to get firetrucks and fire equipment to the fire. And even firemen on foot might not be able to get to it either. The small fire rages and it gets bigger and bigger and bigger.
People could get BBQed underground.
:this:
deleted by creator
Yes, of course. Trains good. I would take buses over self-driving cars. But if we just can't have that, we should have self driving cars that don't require a license. We're not there yet, but it really shouldn't be that far off.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
Self-driving trains though...