The "best" IPCC AR6 climate scenario assumes currently nonexistent carbon removal technology and linear growth in said nonexistent carbon removal efficiency as the nonexistent technology "matures"

    • barrbaric [he/him]
      ·
      3 years ago

      Shit like this. Will it work? Possibly. Will it be used as a crutch that lets us do whatever we want without actually reducing emissions? Definitely.

      • Quimby [any, any]
        ·
        3 years ago

        Headline: Carbon Capture! Hope!

        Buried in the article: "Because the plant currently uses some natural gas, by the time the fuel it produces has been burned it has released a half-tonne of carbon dioxide for every tonne removed from the air. That gives it a carbon footprint 70 per cent lower than a fossil fuel, he said.

        That footprint would shrink further if the plant were all-electric. And if it ran on wind- or solar-generated electricity, the fuel would be almost carbon neutral."

        Almost maybe carbon neutral-ish, in the future, maybe. :yea:

        • barrbaric [he/him]
          ·
          3 years ago

          Well duh, we have to burn it! How else could we monetize saving the planet?

    • AlephNull [she/her]
      ·
      3 years ago

      Thats the OG sequestration method yeah.
      Now waiting on tree2.0