lmao half of the hardware the us has is only useful given an already large force discrepancy, like its CVs and the A-10. i just don't think its productive to completely dismiss them, I guarantee no military around these days has any clue how to conduct a peer war.
I think a peer war is the only thing the PLA spends its time training for though because it's a real defensive army. Whereas the US army spends its time training for asymmetrical war because it is an imperialist military.
You can't ignore the training time investments and what they prioritise.
i agree, i think theyre probably better than the us army when push comes to shove, I just don't think the gulf is as big as its made out to be and there are still some exploitable weaknesses, rather than the usual df21s will wipe the usn in seconds take
They're going to need to be able to see the US navy to do that and this is why the US wants to advance space war. They want to tip the balance via eliminating the eyes that would do the targeting.
lmao half of the hardware the us has is only useful given an already large force discrepancy, like its CVs and the A-10. i just don't think its productive to completely dismiss them, I guarantee no military around these days has any clue how to conduct a peer war.
I think a peer war is the only thing the PLA spends its time training for though because it's a real defensive army. Whereas the US army spends its time training for asymmetrical war because it is an imperialist military.
You can't ignore the training time investments and what they prioritise.
i agree, i think theyre probably better than the us army when push comes to shove, I just don't think the gulf is as big as its made out to be and there are still some exploitable weaknesses, rather than the usual df21s will wipe the usn in seconds take
They're going to need to be able to see the US navy to do that and this is why the US wants to advance space war. They want to tip the balance via eliminating the eyes that would do the targeting.