unfortunately our automatic revisionism detector scrubbed liam from most of this episodeAdam Something on Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/c/AdamSomethingTIC...
I just skipped around the episode and got to Alice saying Stalin was a terrible communist, and that tankies told her to read Stalin's theory which she totally did, and came to the conclusion that he wasn't a "theoretical communist", so uh... cool.
Was that a settled question? Just taking a glance at the wikipedia page:
Historian Stephen Kotkin argued that the evidence for Lenin's authorship of the Testament is weak and suggested that the Testament could have been created by Krupskaya.[5] However, the Testament has been accepted as genuine by most other mainstream historians ... Kotkin's argument was specifically rejected by Richard Pipes
On Kotkin's page:
Kotkin pointed out that the purported dictations were not logged in the customary manner by Lenin's secretariat at the time they were supposedly given; that they were typed, with no shorthand or stenographic originals in the archives, and that Lenin did not initial them;[21][22] that by the alleged dates of the dictations, Lenin had lost much of his power of speech following a series of small strokes on December 15-16, 1922, raising questions about his ability to dictate anything as detailed and intelligible as the Testament[23][24] and that the dictation given in December 1922 is suspiciously responsive to debates that took place at the 12th Party Congress in April 1923.[25]"
Kotkin's isn't Grover Furr, he seems to otherwise be critical of communism, so I dunno.
Besides, Lenin wasn't King of Russia, he doesn't get to just decide who's allowed to succeed him or not. I'm not too familiar with how the Soviet government was organized internally, but I assume organs like the Central Committee and the Politburo would have played a role in questions like this.
I mean Kotkin not being Furr is a plus in his favor. I'd say Lenin certainly considered it and probably would have done so if not for his stroke, but that it doesn't mean much since the citation is iffy and Lenin certainly didn't remove Stalin from power before he died. He 100% could have wanted to, but well if wishes were horses
Yeah, that's why I mentioned it, if it was something by Furr it'd be more easily dismissed, but Kotkin seems to be a respected historian in western circles.
One of the Kill James Bond episodes had them proclaiming their support for Cuba (and maybe Venezuela, I don't remember), but maybe that's just the Abby-Alice-Devon combo in particular being cool. It's why I was surprised by Alice dropping this, I'd have expected it more from Liam or the guest.
Yeah, fair enough. This also reminds me of Zizek, he was on a Chapo episode a while back shilling his new book, and simultaneously praising Luis Arce and shitting on China and Venezuela, two countries which Bolivia under MAS is pretty friendly with.
Same thing with loudly supporting East Germany; yeah it sounds edgy and cool bc of all the narratives about it being a Stasi police state, but it doesn't hit the same as, say, upholding the DPRK or China which are being similarly propagandized, but in the modern day
Was mostly thinking of TF where any mention of China automatically gets 'state capitalism' slotted in afterwards and was explicitly called reactionary in a recent episode.
TF is still a. very funny and b. very good at analysing (for someone finance illiterate like me) the nature of the economy in the west and why and how it produces the morbidities we are seeing.
Trying to work out where on the line I am, namely "The issue with North Korea is that it has succumbed to Right Deviationism and it should return to the true position of Comrade Stalin"
Adam Something, another youtuber that became popular for such amazing takes as "elon musk is dumb" and "public transport and housing are good" is revealed to be an anti-communist? shocked
his videos are fun and fine, at the end it's youtube entertainment and you shouldn't care too much what their hot take is like on the warsaw pact or w/e, they're allowed to be wrong
"it's almost like the soviet union is just like a fascist oligarchy masquerading with a paint of red" - guest in this ep, ~26 min
it's pretty bad folks
:wtyp:
disappointed Alice didn't hit the Soviet Button over that lmao
I just skipped around the episode and got to Alice saying Stalin was a terrible communist, and that tankies told her to read Stalin's theory which she totally did, and came to the conclusion that he wasn't a "theoretical communist", so uh... cool.
:pika-pickaxe:
oof
I mean Lenin did want to remove Stalin from his General Secretary position
Was that a settled question? Just taking a glance at the wikipedia page:
On Kotkin's page:
Kotkin's isn't Grover Furr, he seems to otherwise be critical of communism, so I dunno.
Besides, Lenin wasn't King of Russia, he doesn't get to just decide who's allowed to succeed him or not. I'm not too familiar with how the Soviet government was organized internally, but I assume organs like the Central Committee and the Politburo would have played a role in questions like this.
I mean Kotkin not being Furr is a plus in his favor. I'd say Lenin certainly considered it and probably would have done so if not for his stroke, but that it doesn't mean much since the citation is iffy and Lenin certainly didn't remove Stalin from power before he died. He 100% could have wanted to, but well if wishes were horses
Yeah, that's why I mentioned it, if it was something by Furr it'd be more easily dismissed, but Kotkin seems to be a respected historian in western circles.
The TF crew's use of Soviet aesthetics is exactly that. It's safe because it's dead and gone. They've always been terrible on AES.
One of the Kill James Bond episodes had them proclaiming their support for Cuba (and maybe Venezuela, I don't remember), but maybe that's just the Abby-Alice-Devon combo in particular being cool. It's why I was surprised by Alice dropping this, I'd have expected it more from Liam or the guest.
Cuba and Venezuela are non-threatening.
It's like the leftists who proclaim support for Vietnam and denounce China despite Vietnam being arguably more revisionist.
Yeah, fair enough. This also reminds me of Zizek, he was on a Chapo episode a while back shilling his new book, and simultaneously praising Luis Arce and shitting on China and Venezuela, two countries which Bolivia under MAS is pretty friendly with.
Same thing with loudly supporting East Germany; yeah it sounds edgy and cool bc of all the narratives about it being a Stasi police state, but it doesn't hit the same as, say, upholding the DPRK or China which are being similarly propagandized, but in the modern day
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
Not listened to KJB, but good on Devon.
Was mostly thinking of TF where any mention of China automatically gets 'state capitalism' slotted in afterwards and was explicitly called reactionary in a recent episode.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
TF is still a. very funny and b. very good at analysing (for someone finance illiterate like me) the nature of the economy in the west and why and how it produces the morbidities we are seeing.
They're just still western leftists.
deleted by creator
I see. I’ve only listened to wtyp and they’ve said some stuff that seemed supportive of mao so I kinda hoped they were better on it. Oh well.
On the other hand Rocz does say "The Kulaks deserved it."
Trying to work out where on the line I am, namely "The issue with North Korea is that it has succumbed to Right Deviationism and it should return to the true position of Comrade Stalin"
deleted by creator
Adam Something, another youtuber that became popular for such amazing takes as "elon musk is dumb" and "public transport and housing are good" is revealed to be an anti-communist? shocked
ah I recently had one of his videos come up on youtube, the dubai one. Relatively decent, shame he's posting cringe lol
his videos are fun and fine, at the end it's youtube entertainment and you shouldn't care too much what their hot take is like on the warsaw pact or w/e, they're allowed to be wrong
i said "shame he's posting cringe" not ":wojak-nooo:"
thanks for pointing it out, i now understand
:yikes-1::yikes-2::yikes-2::yikes-2::yikes-2::yikes-2::yikes-2::yikes-2::yikes-2::yikes-3:
Ha, you’re all dorks