It comes from an american indian studies framework where you define things by what they have and not what they lack. So indigenous peoples not colonized peoples. More than human animals, not non human animals. Healing communities not broken communities. Get it?
Again, the relevant information here is what they lack compared to humans.
And secondly, "more than human" just makes no sense and is pretty subjective without specifying what quality they have "more" of. Non-human is just objectively true, they aren't humans.
It comes from an american indian studies framework where you define things by what they have and not what they lack. So indigenous peoples not colonized peoples. More than human animals, not non human animals. Healing communities not broken communities. Get it?
Again, the relevant information here is what they lack compared to humans.
And secondly, "more than human" just makes no sense and is pretty subjective without specifying what quality they have "more" of. Non-human is just objectively true, they aren't humans.