https://twitter.com/abrowngaywrites/status/1444162491131392010?t=d_l-1i5ck1wG0fIsb0tk-Q&s=19

    • LeninWeave [none/use name]
      ·
      edit-2
      3 years ago

      Why? We don't need to lie, we're right. They need to lie because they're factually (among other ways) wrong and now I'm noticing your account name and wondering if I'm playing into a bit.

      • OfficialBenGarrison [he/him]
        ·
        edit-2
        3 years ago

        I'm half serious, half just doing a bit.

        The serious part: I do think the left (although I reluctantly support this) might benefit from being sensationalist.

        The bit part: We don't need to lie, I agree. We just need to sugar coat the truth in a way so normies might accept it. The reason the right is so successful is that people would rather be kissed with a lie than slapped with the truth. Why not kiss people with the truth?

        EDIT: I just deleted my old comment since it's kinda dumb when I actually put thought into it.

        • carbohydra [des/pair]
          ·
          3 years ago

          Fuck it, I'm going full Enlightenment idealist: Our goals are fundamentally different. We want to actually create a better world, and that has to be based on TRUTH and TRUST. Fascists have to lie, because their actual program is miserable for everyone except a select few. We have to tell the truth because otherwise why not join the Democrats, tell flattering lies, and win? If you start disingenuously manipulating people, a leftist movement is impossible. By the people, for the people.
          :liberty-weeping:

        • LeninWeave [none/use name]
          ·
          3 years ago

          Definitely agree, it's largely about the framing when you're trying to convince people of something.