Hard mode, don't mention cars.

  • comi [he/him]
    ·
    3 years ago

    Depends on rural living arrangement I suppose with communal stuff, it doesn’t have to be this way. Just because small villages were supplanted by big boss having their slaves and/or hired workers living separately doesn’t mean the thing was wrong.

    also that seems mighty classist of rural people, don’t become haughty liberal for people feeding you.

    • deepcutsinsideme [she/her]
      hexagon
      ·
      3 years ago

      Guess what class exists and rural people are above city people on the hierarchy, if we collectivise the farms rural people will cease to exist, urbanism won't.

      • comi [he/him]
        ·
        3 years ago

        The fuck they will? Unless you have some unknown advancements in agriculture, people will still have to work there

        • DreamsOfDeadFutures [any]
          ·
          3 years ago

          Clearly, we shall develop sufficiently advanced high speed public transit capable of commuting once we eliminate the scourge of ever being more than 10 feet away from another human being at any point in time by creating urban centers so dense that OP pales in comparison.

      • steve5487 [none/use name]
        ·
        3 years ago

        how are we both uneducated cousin fucking hicks who live in our own filth and an exploitative powerful class

        • deepcutsinsideme [she/her]
          hexagon
          ·
          3 years ago

          The farmers are the exploiting class, the rednecks and hillbillies live on their land. You honestly think those houses you see in the country side with the fields of corn and wheat and soy behind them are actually owned by the people in the house next to it? 9/10 times its land leased by a farmer and the people in the house are renters. Also farmers are rich dumb cousin fuckers bred by the government. The two statements are true.