Yeah and it's bad cities require people outside of them to sustain them, they should be completely self sufficient and that requires increasing density and moving agriculture into urban areas. It would be significantly easier if we cut out farm animals and specific crops like sugar or coffee from people's diets.
All human habitation has a footprint, it's best just to concentrate it into a single area than have it spread out. It's not that living in a city is bad for your health, it's from the fumes of vehicles. Take that out of the equation it's better.
They prefer it because they exhibit anti social behaviors, living outside a city is bad for your health. No emergency services nearby, it's isolation. It should be illegal to build a house in the boonies.
And wouldn't it be easier to solve all those urban problems if EVERYONE had to live in an urban area? I'm not saying f urban living is cheap or close to nature or the apartments are very big but it's for the benefit of the collective why I support it. Because the only way human society can change is if we live in the same material conditions and that can only happen by destroying rural and suburban areas.
It depends on where you live tbh if you have water connected to the municipal watersystem. Many people in the US drink well water straight from the aquifer but some rural people have pipes connected to their house. Don't get me started on septic tanks, out houses, and plumbing.
The farmers are the exploiting class, the rednecks and hillbillies live on their land. You honestly think those houses you see in the country side with the fields of corn and wheat and soy behind them are actually owned by the people in the house next to it? 9/10 times its land leased by a farmer and the people in the house are renters. Also farmers are rich dumb cousin fuckers bred by the government. The two statements are true.
Im from bumfuck west virginia, we had to drink untreated ground water, we burned our trash, I was homeschooled for a significant portion of my childhood. Stop romanticising rural living, raising a kid in those conditions is child abuse, that's why I don't think where you live should be a choice. Where I was I couldn't just take a train or a bus or a taxi, you had to own a car or a horse. And the horse thing has to do with the Amish who I hate with a passion and are no different from the Russian kulaks. Confiscate all their land, relocate the hill people to the city.
We could tear down the suburbs and grow it closer to the cities, and grow a lot less of it. First off ban meat consumption, second stop growing water intensive crops, third zone in urban farming to cities and then the countryside loses all value that it has.
I grew up in rural west virginia, I honestly don't have any experience with suburbs. My hatred for rural backwaters is much higher than your hate for suburban housing developments. I prefer urban living and believe everyone should be forced to live in a city. No one should have to shit in an outhouse, or drink straight groundwater, or be forced to participate in farming at an early age. Suburban people can commute to the cities for the things they can't get in whitepicketfenceville. Rural people can't. I support getting rid of both of them.
Guess what class exists and rural people are above city people on the hierarchy, if we collectivise the farms rural people will cease to exist, urbanism won't.
How about the cost of maintaining the roads and powerlines and infrastructure to keep people like you living in a place no human should live. Leave the forest to nature.
Yeah and it's bad cities require people outside of them to sustain them, they should be completely self sufficient and that requires increasing density and moving agriculture into urban areas. It would be significantly easier if we cut out farm animals and specific crops like sugar or coffee from people's diets.