Hard mode, don't mention cars.

  • silent_water [she/her]
    ·
    3 years ago

    as it stands, living inside a city is also bad for your health and, again, not everyone can live in a city. cities have a wide footprint that support them - this will only get worse as global supply chains collapse and localities are forced to become more self-sufficient in the wake of climate change.

    • deepcutsinsideme [she/her]
      hexagon
      ·
      3 years ago

      All human habitation has a footprint, it's best just to concentrate it into a single area than have it spread out. It's not that living in a city is bad for your health, it's from the fumes of vehicles. Take that out of the equation it's better.

      • silent_water [she/her]
        ·
        3 years ago

        the point is that large footprint requires people living outside the city to sustain it. "concentrating" it doesn't reduce the acreage required to grow the food to support the population living inside the city.

        • deepcutsinsideme [she/her]
          hexagon
          ·
          3 years ago

          Yeah and it's bad cities require people outside of them to sustain them, they should be completely self sufficient and that requires increasing density and moving agriculture into urban areas. It would be significantly easier if we cut out farm animals and specific crops like sugar or coffee from people's diets.