Read this a few days ago. You could teach a few days' of a class on propaganda/media criticism with it. It's got:

• Citing a known liar and charlatan as the main source.

• Citing organizations / think tanks with nice-sounding names that are just CIA cut-outs) adjacent to them.

• Listing one anonymous supposed eyewitness with no attempts to corroborate their story or provide material evidence.

• Making the leap from, "this maybe happened once" (eyewitness story) to "a full-scale boycott of the entire industry is necessary: why would you every buy tomatoes produced by Uyghurs!?"

• A gotcha interview pretending to be undercover where they found nothing at all except a lack of certifications (which ones? They never say) and pretend that there's a big gotcha in the company saying they don't employ Uyghurs but then eventually learning that some of the farming (not what their company does) was done by Uyghurs.

• The implication that employing Uyghurs is inherently bad.

If anything, the real story here is that companies in Xinjiang are responding to these propaganda efforts / economic pressure by taking on anti-Uyghur discriminatory hiring practices. This is never explored by the CBC despite being the likely motivation of the propaganda effort: to undermine China's plan to address radicalization by, in part, focusing on poverty reduction and economic integration.