i just read a snide askhistorians thread where this ass insisted an italian had to be exaggerating child labor in 16th century England, because what really went on was on-average later marriages!
so that's libshit, right? western europe getting so rich cuz late marriage & not y'know, enclosure, proletarianisation, and imperialism is pretty ridiculous.
but if anyones read hajnal and thinks theres something to it please share
Sounds liek someone trying to justify occupation of Ireland and Slavic lands to me.