Just reading capitalist realism and listened to his talk that was linked in the current perusall reading series and I'd like to start a discussion about his ideas.
One major theme of Fisher seems to be the assessment, that culture has lost its forward momentum, that technology has progressed but culture stalled "we're basically watching 20th century entertainment on ever increasing resolution" or in regards to music that "the terms retro and nostalgia have lost their meaning, because now there is nothing else but them". And I'm not quite sure what to make out of this. One one hand I think this is somewhat plausible that a world, in which everything is instantly accessible and arbitrarily copy-able, would be overwhelmed by nostalgia for a time when there was still new and authentic stuff.
On the other hand, is this really the case? "In 15 years we went from the beatles to punk rock". Starting around 2000 somewhat staying in the genre we went from nu-metal to indie-soft-rock to ... whatever we have now. Idk if this is a good example. But to me this seems less self evident and more like a sort of vibe-ology. A mix of hipster-hopelessness and boomer "back in the day we had real ..." sentiment.
Please share your thoughts!
Yeah I agree, and I think I meant to articulate that in my first sentence. Is there really a bigger gap from 1980 to 2000 than from 2000 to 2020, or is it just my brain?
That being said having just finished Giovanni Arrighi's Long Twentieth Century I also don't find it too hard to entertain the thesis that the financialization of capital in the imperial core, and the movement away from investment in production or even trade (just look at Tesla being the highest value car company to see how stark this is) has had disastrous effects on creativity in the arts.