OpenAI published a blog post in response to the New York Times' lawsuit, arguing that it's fine it's sucking up the paper's content for free.
  • Infamousblt [any]
    ·
    10 months ago

    So it's fine if I use OpenAIs content for free without attribution right? That's the same thing? Glad they gave us permission

    • JohnBrownNote [comrade/them, des/pair]
      ·
      10 months ago

      only if you run it through your own LLM

      "ai" (and none of this shit is AI, they should have to change their name) "works" aren't copyrightable so go nuts

      • Awoo [she/her]
        ·
        10 months ago

        If ai will regurgitate its training data then you can perform copyright-laundering via this one neat loophole.

        We can move literally the entire internet (which is basically all in their training data) into the public domain.

          • Awoo [she/her]
            ·
            10 months ago

            Not true, they will completely and totally replicate their training data. The companies try to prevent this so the method to get it to happen regularly changes, but they do it.

            Chatgpt: https://not-just-memorization.github.io/extracting-training-data-from-chatgpt.html

            Image AIs: https://techcrunch.com/2022/12/13/image-generating-ai-can-copy-and-paste-from-training-data-raising-ip-concerns/?guccounter=1

            I'm not saying this would work and you won't get in trouble for doing it. But it would fuck the system just a little bit.