On Nathan J. Robinson. I learnt yesterday that he didn’t do any union-busting, and the departing writers/editors who stirred up so much drama on left-Twitter were lying all along. This article by Yasmin Nair gives the full breakdown with a lot of receipts.
I was linked this article by @HarryLime@hexbear.net in his post yesterday, where NJR was vindicated on calling out Fetterman being terrible back in 2022. The replies to that tweet are filled with people dunking on Nathan, while the quote tweets, almost all from the past couple days, are filled with everyone apologizing.
It’s pretty interesting to see.
I’m currently going through his other tweets. So far, NJR seems like a pretty decent guy with a lot of good analysis', completely different from the caricature I made up in my mind from memes and tweets.
It’s quite strange. I used to read Current Affairs before the “incident” and even listened to the podcast. I liked everyone there, including Nathan. I guess that’s why when I heard what happened, and saw in real time all the people I liked fighting with each other (well, all the people I recognised from the articles and the podcast dunking Nathan), I felt betrayed in a sense. I remember writing an email or filling out a form or something similar that the writers who’d been “fired” had set up. Maybe I donated money too, but I don’t remember that. If I did, it would be a small amount.
And I stopped my subscription to Current Affairs, changing it to Jacobin instead.
There was a lot of trolling that went on. I don’t think I ever tweeted at him personally, but that doesn’t matter. I know I consumed the tweets and posts (even here and on the subreddit back when it existed!)
Why? For me, I guess, it was a sense of justice mixed with betrayal: here was a man who headed an org I respected who had betrayed these principals we all hold dear, and in doing so hurt these other people who I also like. And the only power I have in enacting “justice” is in ridiculing him a little bit.
But even then, that never achieved anything. I won’t say “dunking” as a whole is useless. It can be useful in bringing people together and giving us a sense of camaraderie, but only when it’s against deserving subjects - billionaires and the like. It’s like part of forming an identity around common things we hate.
But… completely divorced from any other forms of unification, any other ways to group and coalesce, all that left is a weak identity that does nothing but dunk for no other purpose. Thats, I guess, what happened to me.
None of us here became leftists for the purpose of trolling others. Using it to hurt and bully others is what people on the right do, even if they consider themselves apolitical sometimes.
But dunking on Nathan…became that. Didn’t it? In the article, Yasmin Nair points to real world examples of people bullying him. I imagine they did so out of a similar feeling of “betrayal”, and sought “justice” too. But how would that achieve it? It wouldn’t. It can’t.
This happened because we separated our actual politics - leftism - from our online activities. Maybe not all of us, but I’d wage at least quite a few. If Current Affairs had failed in the years between the Incident and the start of Jan, 2024, I would’ve thought “sad this happened, but serves him right” with no thought to the actual damage that would’ve done to the real world impacts of losing a magazine like that to left politics.
That’s a failing on my part. It’s a failing that I let my personal grievances with Nathan (Ill-informed as I now know) shut me off completely from Current Affairs as a whole, with all the great writers who work and publish there, then and now.
I remember there was an effort, early on in this site’s history, of making this place more than just a place to shitpost online - to actually be used to organise. It failed, partly because we were small and partly because we were too resistant. There were also onboarding efforts to allow us to grow to mitigate that first problem, but it ran into the second one, our resistance to change, and, well, here we are today. Is there anyone here who remembers those days? What a mess. Since then, a lot of original people who created and did the heavy lifting of maintaining this site, including creatively, left.
I remember enquiring sometime ago, maybe 2022, maybe 2023, about what happened to the writers who left Current Affairs. Have they found other jobs? Where are they working, publishing, podcasting? I wanted to support them. I didn’t figure it out. Some have now deleted their Twitter, others have privated their accounts. Maybe it’s for the best.
Maybe things could’ve been different if we could’ve grown and changed and been the place for atleast left-adjacent people to come by the time Reddit exploded and people started to migrate to Lemmy. Who knows? That’s a different world, and probably also a different post. But at least we could learn something from our mistakes. I am trying to from mine. —
This went in directions I wasn’t expecting. I just typed out my thoughts as they came to me. You don’t really have to read it.
TLDR: “I’m sorry, Nathan” and maybe dunking, without any thing else, is not good.
What is creepy is turning the chair around and engaging in this concern trolling because you saw people make adventurist comments. Talking like "my fellow leftists, we have a problem with guillotine jokes. stop making fun of people who wear bow ties" and then explaining you mean tucker carlson when someone is like "what"
If you've never heard anyone talk like that and think it's a sign of being a serial killer who harbors actual plans of killing their boss, I can reassure you it is quite common.
Joking about pushing the boss into the trash compactor is in fact funny even if it misses the forest for the trees. (Forest being upper management & finance, etcetera.)
You do know the humor in the joke only works when everyone is on the same page about no one actually wanting to push them into the trash compactor? Obviously occasionally joking about killing your boss isn't creepy. Actually wanting to kill your boss is creepy.
If I joke about wanting to jump in traffic to get out of a meeting, it's funny because everyone knows I don't actually want to jump in traffic. If I tell my coworker about wanting to go jump in traffic and they think I mean it, it's somewhat less funny.
Yes, that's why I'm recommending you get on the same page.
Look, you and I both know the person saying "liberals get the bullet too" on twitter is actually as harmless as Dr. Cravat P. Fancylad, but not everyone does. And I don't appreciate having to repeatedly explain to my brainwormed parents that actually communism doesn't involve lining them up against a wall and shooting them.
Your parents probably won redlining. You will be making shocked posts about how they betrayed your effort to "pill them" (I use pill in a derogatory fashion) likely until the bitter end! Sorry! Other people are easier to pill than them, and matter more!
I know the secret of everyone posting about how their parents or their uber driver almost "got it" this time. They likely won't matter in time either. Not at this rate.
I've had limited conversations like this with clients' employees once we get them drunk, with people like you or your parents. Talking about how leftists saying they all just want to smash up the cities are scaring their neighbors. I don't care about them. If amazon lays them off, they'll have a reason to get it. They will then maybe understand optics work the way PFLP, Hamas, Ansar Allah understand they work. The way that successful revolutionary movements understand optics work.
Not the way all the people "cautioning their fellow leftists" think it works.
Oh yeah, if there's one thing history has shown us conclusively it's that economically anxious and un/underemployed people are immune demonization of the left. We can just wait for their life to get worse and then they'll flock to us.
And your solution to this is to take people like your parents' conservative concern trolling seriously? Lol? If you stopped thinking wishfully around these people, they will happily start saying shit straight out of literal Stormfront, city subreddits, Sinclair media. And you think you've got your finger on the pulse of the working class.
I have no idea what concern trolling is even supposed to mean anymore. People views are often incoherent and reactionary, but the notion that their intrinsticly and immutably terrible and pretextual is some weird proto-Christian original sin nonsense that I don't buy.
There is a middle path between Calvinist predestination to hell, KKKilling all KKKraKKKers, and viewing everyone as a who betray their class interests + a life of propaganda because they realized the suffering of homeless people and peripheral countries is wrong. They generally need to be told there's nothing in it for them, and how they can change it.
If people can convince themselves there's something in it for them because of a lifetime of xenophobic programming, or dumb ideas about finances, that makes them scared enough there is just not enough time or luck to fix that.
If you think BlackRedGuard or the Austin maoists or whatever are the left it would explain so much of this exchange tbqh
They're a part of it! And so is Our Beautiful Velvet Boy. And my original post was, given the choice between the two, I think the latter is less cringe.
Fuck the DSA. Fuck nathan j robin$on. Fuck D$A stooge black red guard. LONG LIVE THE BOLIVARIAN REVOLUTION. LONG LIVE ERITREA. LONG LIVE THE DPRK. LONG LIVE THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA
Note: treating this comment like a reflection of how I speak to others outside Hexbear will be held against you as an example of being silly
I will report my own comment for sectarianism don't worry
Also sorry for the exuberance bordering on hostility I'm like venting gases from firing at twitter. I am never going back I got three people to lock their account. It's time to end thjs
Dude, you're fine. I like the energy. Sorta a seriously unserious kinda vibe. Shine on you crazy diamond.
Thanks the other people deserve it (they are no spring chickens) and I'm chilling now. Remain silly
social democrats aren't leftists