• Llituro [he/him, they/them]
    ·
    3 years ago

    Brain cells detached from a body aren't conscious beings though... Neither is a brain, obviously. There's nothing sapient about this. Just a few comrades shitposting about a better world in the face of manmade horrors beyond our comprehension. Chill a bit, climate collapse makes this all a bit of a moot point anyway.

      • Llituro [he/him, they/them]
        ·
        3 years ago

        It's a gestalt composed of myriad human sensory inputs, long term growth and development, human sociality, etc. I think you're kind of having the ole stem cell response about this brain cell thing. Consciousness is processed through the brain, but consciousness alone isn't even particularly interesting. Unless you're :im-vegan: then you accept a lot of the enslavement of consciousness in daily life. I think your issue is the idea of enslaving sapience for computing power, and on those terms I'd agree with you. But again, that's a very far cry from anything anyone here has been talking about.

        • GalaxyBrain [they/them]
          ·
          3 years ago

          Anyone with a job is also being enslaved for their computational powers by evil capitalists. That's just literally using your brain at all for anything related to work.

        • WammaWink2 [none/use name]
          ·
          edit-2
          3 years ago

          I am :im-vegan: though

          We absolutely should not "accept the enslavement of consciousness in daily life". Fuck that

          Sapience should not be used as a ruler for morality

          • Llituro [he/him, they/them]
            ·
            3 years ago

            Sapience should not be used as a ruler for morality

            Sure, but I hope you can see that this isn't something everyone agrees on, or even is specific enough to have a debate about without having some broader moral framework. And even then, again, it's not even clear if we're discussing conscious human minds. I really don't think we are.

            • WammaWink2 [none/use name]
              ·
              edit-2
              3 years ago

              I think the ambiguity is enough to make it something that would be banned in a sane society until we learn more

              abortion isn't as ambiguous, for instance, so that's fine

              • Llituro [he/him, they/them]
                ·
                3 years ago

                Yeah, a sane society would absolutely be considering this a lot more than just the fever dreams of whatever neoliberal scientists and lizard people capitalists think sounds cool.