• TheLepidopterists [he/him]
      ·
      11 months ago

      Well, shit for brains, if you'd read my post you'd know they were poor, so they didn't have money for all the attorney's fees that are necessary for that plan.

      PIGPOOPBALLS

      • hpca01@programming.dev
        ·
        11 months ago

        Cool cool cool cool cool. They can afford a home in California but they're dirt poor to afford an attorney?

        • silent_water [she/her]
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          trains only run through expensive urban areas? people living in rented apartments deserve no protections?

        • TheLepidopterists [he/him]
          ·
          11 months ago

          What the fuck are you talking about California for, eminent domain is done across the whole country

    • ExotiqueMatter@lemmygrad.ml
      ·
      11 months ago

      you could tell them that at least they had the right to fight it in court.

      What liberal education does to a mf.

      The liberal notion that you have the "right" to do something when some politician sign a paper that say you can do something even when you'll never be able to actually do it is dogshit.

      What good is on paper having the "right" to do something if you don't have the material capability to exert that right? They could just be honnest and pass a law forbiding anyone worth bellow 1M$ to fight construction companies in court and litteraly almost nothing would be different.

      Also, I'd like you to show to me proof that the chinese peoples are forbiden from fighting the HSR constuctors in court.

    • GarbageShoot [he/him]
      ·
      11 months ago

      When some chud court tells them to go fuck themselves because building a boarder wall as a symbolic gesture of fascism is more important, at least they can remember China Bad