• CthulhusIntern [he/him]
    hexagon
    ·
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    They didn't just try to execute you, but they noticed you weren't on the list to be executed and you were put in the block by mistake... and then decided to try to execute you anyways, and the only reason you're alive is that there was a convenient dragon interruption.

    That's the kind of writing you do when you WANT someone to side with the rebels... And I remember that just about everyone I knew sided with the Stormcloaks for that very reason.

    Now, the reason they did that was clearly because, at the time, there was that weird trend in games in which there's an intro with a pseudo-cutscene in which you can move the camera but not much else, and you were in the back of a vehicle, often on the way to die or be knocked unconscious.

    • UlyssesT
      ·
      edit-2
      16 days ago

      deleted by creator

      • Tofu_Lewis [he/him]
        ·
        3 years ago

        At least in Far Cry 2 (underrated, problematic, and sometimes a chore to play) you're immobilized because you have malaria, which actually affects the game in the beginning when you're looking for anti-malarial pills.

    • eduardog3000 [he/him]
      ·
      3 years ago

      pseudo-cutscene in which you can move the camera but not much else

      That part actually makes some sense for people super new to games to get used to the camera controls.

    • Mardoniush [she/her]
      ·
      edit-2
      3 years ago

      I sided with the Imperials...but then I'd read the Nu Mantia Intercepts and knew the Thalmor had the Empire over a barrel and were the real threat.

      Also, The Prisoner is one of the God-Archetypes of The Elder Scrolls and has to start the game in chains.