I hate the whole publicly traded model of companies. I hate capitalism. But have to engage in trading stocks (I mostly do Mutual Funds and a small quantity of direct stocks) so that my money doesn't lose value by sitting in a bank or cash.

Same thing with credit cards, don't like taking loans and getting marked on a centralised list for that but it's a safer option than using your own money.

Fortunately I don't do crypto so that's a plus.

  • leftofthat [he/him]
    ·
    5 months ago

    If the only two options for investing are "become a ghoulish rent seeker" or "don't do that" then yeah that's where it would come down

    You didn't mention "become a landlord" as an option. Why not? That's a perfectly viable path for many working class Americans to retire into.

      • leftofthat [he/him]
        ·
        5 months ago

        What does that even mean? I think people should not invest their money in rent seeking and should put it elsewhere when they can, even if it means receiving less of a return on investment.

        Are we just debating ethics and morality? It's pretty boring ngl

            • TheLepidopterists [he/him]
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              So instead of a stock index fund, which is where a pension would have put the money anyways if I were lucky enough to have one, I should give the money directly to the US government to hold onto so they can ensure that they can afford Israel's bomb budget? That's way more ethical?

              EDIT: like the ethics gap is so big that anyone who just puts the money in the stock index instead of choosing to give it to Uncle Sam is a "rent-seeking ghoul" who should "feel dirty?"

              • leftofthat [he/him]
                ·
                5 months ago

                "so they can ensure that they can afford"

                They don't need your money

                • CannotSleep420@lemmygrad.ml
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  In an economy based on generalized commodity production, you actually do need a certain amount of money to sustain yourself.

                • TheLepidopterists [he/him]
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  Whatever helps you sleep at night while paying not only taxes into the US military's budget, but voluntarily buying bonds to fund them.

                  Do you see how this conversation is asinine? There is no ethical choice under capitalism.

                  • leftofthat [he/him]
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    There's a moral difference in owning a savings bond and being a landlord. Sorry if you don't want to engage with that and think it's all a wash because nothing is ethical under capitalism.

                    • TheLepidopterists [he/him]
                      ·
                      5 months ago

                      Having a savings bond and being a landlord are different and both are different from having a 401k account that is invested in mutual funds.

                      Putting your retirement savings in a mutual fund doesn't make you a capitalist anymore than owning the savings bond makes you a bomb manufacturer.

                      • leftofthat [he/him]
                        ·
                        edit-2
                        5 months ago

                        I said above:

                        There's no functional difference to buying a $200,000 apartment and renting it out as a landlord or putting $200,000 in a 401k managed retirement fund that owns several hundred apartments buildings. And they do.

                        We can disagree there, then. There's a much cleaner and direct connection between a fund and rent extraction than there is between a savings bond and a bomb. That's exactly my point. These details matter.

                        You can lump it all together if you want. I see more nuance.

                        • TheLepidopterists [he/him]
                          ·
                          edit-2
                          5 months ago

                          I don't agree that the connection is much more direct.

                          Do you feel the same way about pensions?

                          EDIT:

                          Also, when I was 19, making less than minimum wage waiting tables at a buffet, struggling to make my half of the rent payments for my shithole apartment I put what I could spare into a 401k. I didn't look at the investments at all, which means they were whatever the fund did by default, aka probably stocks. Was I a landlord at the time?

                          • leftofthat [he/him]
                            ·
                            5 months ago

                            I addressed pensions in my initial comment.

                            Most pension funds have a similar issue in that they are investing in rent seeking etc. But unlike 401ks, pensions carry with them significant political power than can influence where the money is going. This is (imo) why they are being gutted in favor of individual 401k accounts.

                            Unions and pensions can be powerful tools. They're being replaced by Independent Contractors and 401ks.

                            If a pension fund looks identical to a 401k index fund then yeah I'd have the same opinion.

                            • TheLepidopterists [he/him]
                              ·
                              5 months ago

                              This is so fucking tiresome.

                              Unions exist to support their members' interests. To that effect they want the pension funds' money invested efficiently and safely. They're not buying bonds for moral reasons (again they're not, it's a direct investment in the US Empire) but for security reasons. They're not buying specific stocks because they're more moral, but because they look like promising investments.

                              It's not morally better than a 401k, it's just more efficient and removes the individual worker from having to deal with the investments personally.

                              They're being gutted because it's cheaper for the companies who are extracting every dime they can from their workers.

                              So I guess revised list of options

                              1. Pension - only if you're a dirty rent-seeking landlord
                              2. 401k invested identically to a pension - only if you're a dirty rent-seeking landlord
                              3. social security - not viable
                              4. die at your post - leftofthat approved
                              5. shovel more money directly into the empire's coffers - leftofthat approved
                              • leftofthat [he/him]
                                ·
                                5 months ago

                                Damn those are some bleak options, yeah. Almost like the US is a capitalist hellscape or something.

                                "Join us or perish" is what they seem to be signaling, yeah.

                                Apparently you see that as only having two choices and are going with "join them," which is fine I'm not your morality coach. I'm certainly not asking you to sit down and die.

                                You can rationalize it all you want. That you have no choice but to participate. I hear it all the time from people telling me to vote for Biden.

                                • CannotSleep420@lemmygrad.ml
                                  ·
                                  5 months ago

                                  You can rationalize it all you want. That you have no choice but to participate. I hear it all the time from people telling me to vote for Biden.

                                  "You criticize society yet you live in it. Curious."