Really it isn't the crewed spaceflight to the moon that's the point, it's the things we invent in order to send a crew to the moon. People talk a lot about velcro and tang, but the most significant outgrowth of the space program was the massive advancements in portable/durable computing that it pioneered.
In the case of a moon base, I think the most significant breakthrough still on the table is in-situ resource usage. The moon itself can hypothetically be turned into rocket fuel, greatly decreasing the cost to get there and come back, and mining the moon is a significant step to mining an asteroid.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
Really it isn't the crewed spaceflight to the moon that's the point, it's the things we invent in order to send a crew to the moon. People talk a lot about velcro and tang, but the most significant outgrowth of the space program was the massive advancements in portable/durable computing that it pioneered.
In the case of a moon base, I think the most significant breakthrough still on the table is in-situ resource usage. The moon itself can hypothetically be turned into rocket fuel, greatly decreasing the cost to get there and come back, and mining the moon is a significant step to mining an asteroid.
How? Did NASA's dog eat their blueprints? And then eat the scientists who created the blueprints?