As the title says. It is also not mentioned on the articles "Terrorism in Europe" despite it being one of the largest terrorist programs on European soil, and "Bologna Massacre" despite the fact that the materials for the bomb used almost certainly coming from Gladio.
I guess it really is Natopedia
Some discussion of this in pages 2 and 3 of the archived Talk pages:
The statement "NATO Summit 2006 will take place in Latvia" and "Connections to terrorism" appear out of place in the Purpose section. The later should probably be in a criticisms section for neutrality reasons. As I read it, Operation Gladio was intended for clandestine operations if NATO members became occupied. There's a big difference between that and what is stated as "right wing terrorist organisations", so I think the reason for that wording needs to be clarified. Otherwise it reads like leftist propaganda. Thanks. — RJH (talk) 17:37, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:NATO/Archive_2
:agony-shivering:
But:
Come on boys, if Gladio had been a Soviet Union initiative, we would still read and hear over n over and over ad nauseam how the Empire of Evil contaminated with dormant terrorist cells its vassal countries - it would be on Wikipedia Warsaw Pact page, on the NYP archives, and repeated all the time during every official speech for every adniversary of any cold war memorial.:P
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:NATO/Archive_3
Lefties read a lot of history. You'd think we could maintain our own little wiki with great sourcing so long as there were good vandalism protections + mods.
There is leftypedia.org, but it's kinda sloppy and not well-maintained, lots of missing content, etc.
Not exactly leftist, but WikiSpooks.com is a good starting resource on deep politics, which includes things like Gladio. Just be careful because it has attracted some antisemites since it's about conspiracies.
i was actually shocked the little conflict box for the years of lead had Gladio as a 'participant'
