I read a portion of this in college and I remember not being too fond of it, and I've just sort of heard it's not a good book, sorta racist and eurocentric. I'm wondering what the real criticisms of this book are though since looking at a summary its seems sort of materialist?

Mostly wondering since my dad, who has not read a book since probably 1973, is getting a copy from the library and I want to know what chud shit I'm gonna have to deal with at the dinner table for the next couple months.

  • JohnBrownsBussy [he/him]
    ·
    2 years ago

    Jared Diamond's mission is the book is to dispel that Europe and its settler-states became hegemonic due to any inherent qualities of white people. While Diamond debunks some racist myths, he replaces them with a new "just-so" story about geography and ecology that really doesn't have that much explanatory power. That geographical determinism also serves to absolve the settler-states of their crimes by portraying it as a given that Europeans would plunder the western hemisphere.