• Munrock@lemmygrad.ml
    ·
    4 months ago

    At the press of a button, all of those Chinese smart cars will transform to robot mode and form the AI-PLA! They'll then promptly repair and upgrade all of the USA's shithole-tier infrastructure, distribute educational tools and pamphlets across the US working class to give them class consciousness, and then promptly turn back into cars so that the US proletariat have the mobility needed to effectively organise.

    • AOCapitulator [they/them]
      ·
      4 months ago

      "your heated seat rental (and power steering) has lapsed, please swipe your card to restore functionality!"

  • الأرض ستبقى عربية@lemmygrad.ml
    ·
    4 months ago

    China is already the largest exporter of cars and they are pretty much banned from the US market except for US-branded cars like the Buick Envision. There's the whole rest of the world where China can undercut and possibly annihilate US and European makers.

  • darkcalling@lemmygrad.ml
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    I love how they can just completely ignore the WTO and their own capitalist free and fair trade rules when they suit them by crying national security. As long as it has electronics in it no one even looks at it funny.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmygrad.ml
      hexagon
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      US has been massively abusing TWO and has blocked judge nominations so cases against it can't go forward https://www.scmp.com/week-asia/explained/article/3042511/us-has-crippled-wtos-appeal-court-what-does-mean-asia

      China also published an interesting report on the subject, in particular:

      The US poses the biggest challenge to the global trading system. Following “America First” policy, the US has refused to shoulder its due obligations under multilateral trading agreements, and withdrawn from international treaties and organizations, taking a heavy toll on the development and functioning of the global trading system. A WTO dispute settlement report has identified the US as the biggest rule-breaker, responsible for two-thirds of violations of WTO rules. The US also blocked the appointment of new judges in the WTO Appellate Body, leading to an impasse in the Appellate Body since December 2019.

      https://www.mfa.gov.cn/eng/wjbxw/202206/t20220619_10706059.html

      • DamarcusArt@lemmygrad.ml
        ·
        4 months ago

        I'm starting to think that BRICS wasn't even something these nations did willingly, but they were forced into it by the US just not giving them any other options if they didn't want their economies to be strangled.

  • AOCapitulator [they/them]
    ·
    4 months ago

    How about the national security risk of structuring your entire society around cars?

    Glad we're safe there!

  • bleepingblorp@lemmygrad.ml
    ·
    4 months ago

    Cool, let's waste tax money on this ""investigation"". Better than spending it on bombs for Zionist terrorists to use against children I guess.

    Also, completely unrelated side note: did you know US homelessness increased 12% in 2023? If that pace continues we'll double the homeless population between 5-6 years, and by about 2040 the percentage of USians who are homeless will be past 1% (so one out of every hundred people in the US). So glad we aren't spending money to investigate that, cuz fuck the poors amIright? /s

    • destroyamerica@lemmygrad.ml
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      we're not wasting any tax money on this, taxes do not actually fund the US government's spending. This will not harm military production, the money used to buy labor to do these investigations will not eat into the labor pool and capital that would help with military production

  • Sodium_nitride@lemmygrad.ml
    ·
    4 months ago

    I'm conflicted on how I feel about this. On one hand, protectionist slows down the deindustrialization of America, which is bad. On the other hand, it hampers American competitiveness and innovation.

    • loathesome dongeater@lemmygrad.ml
      ·
      4 months ago

      On the other hand, it hampers American competitiveness and innovation.

      Mildly disagree with this. Protectionism alone does not hamper innovation. For example, China's protectionism against American tech companies like Amazon and Facebook didn't do so because there was a complimentary policy in place to help develop alternatives. If America is never going to invest in electric cars properly, their automobile industry is not going to keep up, protected or not.

      • Sodium_nitride@lemmygrad.ml
        ·
        4 months ago

        True, but with protectionism, America's private industry loses even the slightest motivation to continue innovating. Also it increases the cost of things in America.