Permanently Deleted

  • eduardog3000 [he/him]
    ·
    3 years ago

    it’s cause you sided with the accelerationist while still having increasing emissions or temperature.

    I don't even know what the accelerationist is supposed to be. Accelerationism makes no sense after a revolution. I sided with the authoritarians and did the most sensible things I could within the bounds of the shitty "political power" system. Emissions and temperature were both going down.

    The ELF guy tells you he doesn’t like the accelerationist as an ally because he thinks the industry is polluting.

    Which is incredibly dumb. Industry isn't inherently polluting, it's when that industry uses fossil fuels and generally operates with disregard for the environment and ecology in favor of profit.

    just force through your policy and don’t worry about a few terrorist attacks

    Ahh yes, very realistic. Who cares about people getting killed? Especially when siding with the authoritarians, I should at least have a way to crack down on them until they're defeated.

    The techs like nuclear fusion have a 1% chance to succeed

    No they don't. They say they do, but they're literally hard coded to never succeed.

    it’s a bad and insanely risky idea to bet on technology that doesn’t exist yet to solve a problem happening RIGHT NOW

    It's not like research into nuclear fusion takes away from anything else. We have perfectly functional fission technology that doesn't really need researchers working on it. And nuclear physicists can't exactly pick up and go work in another field. And I think some of the other non-nuclear stuff I saw doesn't exist yet either. But even if that's the case, just don't present that as an option.

    Also you definitely can go vegetarian and not vegan that’s how I won the game. I don’t think I even got rid of factory farming lol, I just reduced the animal calorie demand a lot via the animal liberation policies.

    That doesn't sound vegetarian, it sounds like you just reduced meat consumption.

    Animal agriculture is completely unsustainable irl anyway

    No, it's not. Capitalists' way of handling it is unsustainable, because capitalism is unsustainable. Like you said we will have to reduce consumption, but "unsustainable" would mean we have to cut out consumption entirely.