The Industrial Workers of the World, or IWW, was founded in 1905 in Chicago, and by 1908 had become influential among migrant laborers in the Pacific Northwest. Members were dubbed "Wobblies" and soon earned a reputation for loud singing, radicalism, and militancy. IWW members and organizers played an active role in Northwest metal mining (in Idaho), logging, and agriculture. In 1909 the IWW Spokane free-speech fight was an early and legendary example of direct action in support of constitutional rights. The massive statewide lumber strike in the summer of 1917 brought the industry to a halt at the beginning of World War I. The union's bloody clashes with authorities in Everett (1916) and Centralia (1919) became the stuff of legend. IWW membership and influence declined sharply after the anti-radical purges of the World War I era, but the union never quite died off. Young IWW members made a dramatic reappearance in Seattle during protests around the World Trade Organization conference in late 1999.

A Democratic, Industrial Union

The IWW was an "industrial" union, one that embraced and organized both skilled and unskilled workers within particular industries. Formed in 1905 partly in opposition to the craft unionism of the American Federation of Labor (AFL), it was a democratic union with a mix of radical anti-capitalist politics. The founding membership included socialists and labor unionists of various kinds, dominated by the militant, radical metal miners of the Western Federation of Miners.

Shortly after the IWW was formed, Bill Haywood and two other leaders of the Western Federation of Miners were arrested on the charge that they had murdered former Idaho Governor Frank Steunenberg. Idaho Senator William Borah was the prosecuting attorney and Clarence Darrow led the defense. The three union leaders were acquitted, and Haywood returned to an active role with the IWW.

Tenets and Tactics

From 1908 to 1917, the IWW in Washington state was particularly influential among migrant laborers who rode the boxcars to follow the harvest or to get a job in a lumber camp. The IWW was considered radical because it supported worker ownership of factories, a 40-hour work week, and sanitary conditions in logging camps.

Seattle General Strike and After

By 1919 many IWW leaders were in jail, and many Wobbly union halls had been raided, wrecked, and closed. The 1919 Seattle General Strike was not dominated by IWW members, yet it would be unfair to dismiss IWW influence in the city's labor community. Many unionists were dual union members. As one of the songs in the late 1980s rock opera Seattle 1919 goes, many workers had one card for their job and one for what they believed.

Most local and national press denounced the strike, while conservatives called for stern measures to suppress what looked to them like a revolutionary plot. Mayor Ole Hanson (1874-1940), elected the year before with labor support, armed his police force and threatened martial law and federal troops. After the General Strike fizzled out in February 1919, police raided the IWW hall and Socialist Party headquarters, and closed the labor daily newspaper Union Record.

The IWW survived, but continuing government harassment and the return of prosperity in the Roaring Twenties undercut its influence. It was involved in organizing laborers at late-1920s Seattle City Light projects in the North Cascades, in Boulder Dam near Las Vegas, Nevada, and in the Yakima orchards of the 1930s. It is no secret that many older Wobblies were involved in both the organizing in the woods of the Northwest and in the nation's auto industry in the 1930s.

As of the late 1990s, IWW chapters were operating in Seattle, Olympia, and Portland, Oregon. Seattle Wobblies tried to organize workers at a small food store in West Seattle, but the drive ended when the store management changed in 1998. In November 1999, IWW members and supporters were prominent among the thousands who protested the World Trade Organization's Seattle session.

The IWW's Little Red Songbook, first published in Spokane in 1909, has been updated constantly, proving that Wobbly ideas and hopes are still alive. It has been a cultural icon of the labor movement, helping to keep alive the notion that "When you stop singing, the revolution has ended and so has the progress of the union."

The IWW's founders included many historically important labor activists and socialist thinkers, including Big Bill Haywood, James Connolly, Daniel De Leon, Eugene V. Debs, Thomas Hagerty, Lucy Parsons, Mary Harris "Mother" Jones, Frank Bohn, William Trautmann, Vincent Saint John, Ralph Chaplin, and many others.

Announcements & Information

Megathreads and spaces to hang out:

reminders:

  • 💚 You nerds can join specific comms to see posts about all sorts of topics
  • 💙 Hexbear’s algorithm prioritizes struggle sessions over upbears
  • 💜 Sorting by new you nerd
  • 🌈 If you ever want to make your own megathread, you can go here nerd

Links To Resources (Aid and Theory):

Aid:

Theory:

  • Huldra [they/them, it/its]
    ·
    2 years ago

    Sorry for bringing this up in 3 consecutive megathreads but its really driving me fucking insane.

    I know its mostly angry and emotional people saying this shit about vasectomies so its not meant to be 100% reddit atheism rationality, but it still is amazing how much cognitive dissonance is going on when you have all these accounts making epic modest proposals to show how "men wouldnt ever regulate mens bodies" and someone points out how men of pretty much any imaginable minority have been targeted for eugenics and sterilization by mostly other men in positions of power before and to some extents currently as well, so this modest proposal rings tone deaf at best.

    And then you get this sarcastic spiel of "ooooh nooooo wont someone think of the MEN in danger, sorry sweaty but could we focus for one second on WOMEN and their rights and lives being in danger!?", as if this isnt a discourse entirely manufactured by people thinking that its somehow more effective to focus on the supposed hypocrisy of men and doing "by your own logic" towards people who either dont even have twitter accounts or who think anything that comes out the mouth of pro-choice supporters is satanic propaganda.

    Just seems like it would be so much simpler and more solidarity building to focus on improving bodily autonomy for those that have theirs infringed, rather than starting fights with people who explain that "This not only isnt effective propaganda but it also ignores how you can lose a lot of bodily autonomy instantly by being disabled in some way regardless of your gender", I cant imagine that a single person who is bringing up the history and reality of eugenics would not be fully prepared to go 100% in for abortion rights in order to pool resources for the best shot at winning some rights back for a lot of people.

    • zeal0telite [he/him,they/them]
      ·
      2 years ago

      It's stupid because it alienates your base and galvanises your opponents.

      Your supporters probably already believed in abortion rights and now you're doing weird eugenics shit which might turn them off, and opponents of abortion rights get to go "look, this was always their next step after abortion!"

      The right already uses the documented history of racism and eugenics to abortions to their advantage, why give them that extra ammo? You're just proving them right.

    • Zuzak [fae/faer, she/her]
      ·
      2 years ago

      Supporting abortion rights is too mainstream, if you don't have an edgy take, how are people supposed to know that you're better than everyone else?

      • ajouter [she/her]
        ·
        2 years ago

        it's not even an edgy take, it's just democrats being obsessed with calling republicans hypocrites.