https://nitter.net/naebumaye/status/1545931184575856641?t=iviQuag-Kdk1k09jHQvQLQ&s=19

  • WIIHAPPYFEW [he/him, they/them]
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    SDL temporarily falls from grace, and some people think "PAWG" is racist in the wake of it, get into an argument with someone who disagrees, target a woman who's friends with that person by mocking the sexual harassment she experienced, joke about eating the pet pig of a person trying to defend her, and one of the ringleaders of the group says Anne Frank had white privilege. (No idea where the snickers discourse is involved though)

    • hexaflexagonbear [he/him]
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Juniper (leftist shitposter) made a joke about how thanks to cancel culture they took the dick vein out of the snickers bar (and posted a smooth snickers bar). A bunch of chuds fell for it as with every joke. The "Anne frank had white privilege" crowd took the original joke to both be racist, but also an intentional plot by Juniper to stoke fascism in America through fake news.

      There's people they've been actively harassing for over 2 years now, so it's kind of tough to say they're a funny crowd, but man I did not see this escalating to holocaust denial.

    • Nakoichi [they/them]M
      ·
      2 years ago

      PAWG is definitely racist. It's a porn term with all sorts of weird fetishism involved.

      • iwishthiswasicq [none/use name]
        ·
        2 years ago

        weird fetishism ≠ racist

        would you call women calling themselves a pawg to be racist? or someone calling someone a pawg to be racist?

        • Nakoichi [they/them]M
          ·
          2 years ago

          What makes it racist is that is specifically used to relate white women's bodies to stereotypes of black women's bodies. I'm not here to have a debate just pointing out that it is definitely a problematic term.