I guess that works for libs, but libs are like cats. They are friendly with whoever feeds them praise. Sure they may be standoffish at first and then pretend they rule the roost, but at the end of the day they come when you feed them. We are fortunate that most Americans are libs, but I think at some point a strategy has to be developed to combat the sheer mind rot-dog obedience training conservatives undergo. Idk if there is a way to do that that doesn't fundamentally betray communist principles, outside of straight violent confrontation, which we are likely a decade or more away from.

This. It is not a lack of reading, it is not even so much a lack of education. It is that the hegemonic influence of liberal capitalism has gone unopposed in popular knowledge. You have to cut its roots, not just jump in and acquiesce to their base premise of the world but suggest some improvements.

Per Gramsci

The fundamental division into classical and vocational (professional) schools was a rational formula: the vocational school for the instrumental classes, the classical school for the dominant classes and the intellectuals. The development of an industrial base both in the cities and in the countryside meant a growing need for the new type of urban intellectual. Side by side with the classical school there developed the technical school (vocational, but not manual), and this placed a question-mark over the very principle of a concrete programme of general culture, a humanistic programme of general culture based on the Græco-Roman tradition. This programme, once questioned, can be said to be doomed, since its formative capacity was to a great extent based on the general and traditionally unquestioned prestige of a particular form of civilisation....

.....It may also be observed that deliberative bodies tend to an everincreasing extent to distinguish their activity into two “organic” aspects: into the deliberative activity which is their essence, and into technicalcultural activity in which the questions upon which they have to take decisions are first examined by experts and analysed scientifically. This latter activity has already created a whole bureaucratic body, with a new structure; for apart from the specialised departments of experts who prepare the technical material for the deliberative bodies, a second body of functionaries is created—more or less disinterested “volunteers”, selected variously from industry, from the banks, from finance houses. This is one of the mechanisms by means of which the career bureaucracy eventually came to control the democratic regimes and parliaments now the mechanism is being organically extended, and is absorbing into its sphere the great specialists of private enterprise, which thus comes to control both régimes and bureaucracies. What is involved is a necessary, organic development which tends to integrate the personnel specialised in the technique of politics with personnel specialised in the concrete problems of administering the essential practical activities of the great and complex national societies of today. Hence every attempt to exorcise these tendencies from the outside produces no result other than moralistic sermons and rhetorical lamentations.