A destigmatization of sexuality, and of sex workers (though not the industry, I think) is important, and should be something approached- if cautiously, due to how deeply rooted such beliefs are held- by socialists, sure. And I think there ought to be a space for porn, if not as a commercial product (at least in regards to actual, human porn), considering that pornographic/sexual/stimulating art is- honestly, probably as old as humanity if not older, and sexuality plays such a significant role in our species.
But the sex/flesh industry has to be condemned, and there's no way in hell the state should get involved in it.
considering that pornographic/sexual/stimulating art is- honestly, probably as old as humanity
This point is missing a lot in the p**n debate. The fact that people will make erotic art spontaneously, including filmmaking, makes it pointless to defend the current industry, while recontextualizing the notion of banning it.
A destigmatization of sexuality, and of sex workers (though not the industry, I think) is important, and should be something approached- if cautiously, due to how deeply rooted such beliefs are held- by socialists, sure. And I think there ought to be a space for porn, if not as a commercial product (at least in regards to actual, human porn), considering that pornographic/sexual/stimulating art is- honestly, probably as old as humanity if not older, and sexuality plays such a significant role in our species.
But the sex/flesh industry has to be condemned, and there's no way in hell the state should get involved in it.
This point is missing a lot in the p**n debate. The fact that people will make erotic art spontaneously, including filmmaking, makes it pointless to defend the current industry, while recontextualizing the notion of banning it.