I hope this doesnt fall under sectarianism. I just enjoyed the idea of state mandated slumber parties.

  • edge [he/him]
    hexbear
    28
    3 months ago

    Synthesis: slumber parties where you stay up all night

  • Mardoniush [she/her]
    hexbear
    22
    3 months ago

    Communism is Soviet Power plus vaguely lesbian coded slumber parties.

    • Comp4 [she/her]
      hexagon
      hexbear
      19
      3 months ago

      You will be assigned the role of "Mom" or "Dad" by the politburo. No need for nuclear family.

        • Comp4 [she/her]
          hexagon
          hexbear
          15
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          New titles will be handed out by popular demand. The Politburo represents the will of the people. I do not speak on behalf of the politburo, but I'm certain they are closely monitoring this thread

  • @JohannaChittarra
    hexbear
    17
    3 months ago

    Someday will be the last fucking day I see a wojak. I await this day.

    • Xx_Aru_xX [she/her]
      hexbear
      9
      3 months ago

      shows up to your deathbed with a soyjak drawing on my t-shirt

    • @DamarcusArt@lemmygrad.ml
      hexbear
      13
      3 months ago

      It will be mandatory that all citizens at the People's Slumber Party will drink so much cola and eat so many skittles that their saliva starts to burn their mouths.

  • Stoneykins [any]
    hexbear
    14
    3 months ago

    I would think that "bedtime abolition" discourse is inherently secterian, because isn't so much a real discourse as it is a parody of a discourse to try and make general statements about the validity of anarchist thought. But, I would also argue it is such a mild form of sectarianism that it is less consequential than the sectarianism that is already allowed on hexbear.

    But idk I'm just guessing I don't have much of a basis for that

    • 420blazeit69 [he/him]
      hexbear
      8
      3 months ago

      I'd go simpler: depicting anarchists as crying wojacks watching Triumph of the Will is obviously, hamfistedly sectarian lmao

  • Gorb [they/them]
    hexbear
    14
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    This is basically how I run my house since we don't have enough individual bedrooms the beds overlap with office and leasure spaces so we have an agreed bed time and wakeup time. I'm tankiemaxxing, also my cat enforces the routine gamer-gulag

  • darkmode [comrade/them]
    hexbear
    11
    3 months ago

    I was intrigued by the struggle session comment from some months ago that posed the strange idea, paraphrasing that, hexbear’s antisectarian rules imagined some idealized form of the other that agrees with all the opinions of the former. This obviously doesn’t exist IRL which IMO makes it an odd rule for a shitposting website

    • KobaCumTribute [she/her]
      hexbear
      16
      3 months ago

      I would argue that despite appearances successful revolutions actually did embody that: despite sectarian power struggles between different organizations, revolutions were defined by concessions to material reality and the cooperation and compromise needed to actually keep going and survive. "Doctrinally pure" sectarians were wreckers while the surviving party became an impure synthesis of its component members. Like Kropotkin personally argued with Lenin, but ultimately cooperated with him in the limited capacity his age allowed and he was likewise provided for by the Soviet state. In China the CPC relied heavily on peasant anarchists during the revolution whose ideology shaped the party and its policies even as they were subsumed into it.

      Obviously there was still sectarian infighting and whatnot, but fundamentally history shows that revolutions have to be a synthesis of their component parts and a compromise between doctrinal purity and material reality. So if a revolution comes to the imperial core it is going to be made up of everyone who is willing to work together, and anyone sticking to ancient party lines and splitting over them at that point will be a wrecker. Hexbear's basically following that ideal, laying out some basic core tenets against bigotry and chauvinism and then saying "don't start petty bullshit with each other over other policy disagreements." Like someone should be dogpiled for doing American imperial apologia, but not for having a different take on what post-revolution logistics and organization should look like for example.

      • darkmode [comrade/them]
        hexbear
        2
        3 months ago

        I definitely shouldn’t have said “obviously” because clearly I didn’t know anything lol ty

    • @Great_Leader_Is_Dead
      hexbear
      5
      3 months ago

      I find it a bit weird, people justify the anti-sectarian rule not applying to Trots cuz they've had bad experiences with Trots. Okay, I'm willing to bet plenty of anarchists have had bad experiences with MLs and MLs with anarchists but I guess we value us getting along enough in this space to feign that it never happens. Trots tho, nah get fucked.