at least when it comes to consumer tech

like i can't even remember the last time i was excited for a new tech thing. maybe my second smart phone, i guess? that one was at least a big improvement from my first one. third was marginally better, and then the fourth, which i'm using now, i feel like i only got because of planned obsolescence (slow down/battery problems etc.)

it's such a stark contrast from growing up in the 90s/early 2000s

  • Diogenes_Barrel [love/loves]
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    its self-fulfilling understaffing prophecy

    lines are too long we need more staff

    ill build kiosks to expedite small orders & have customers do the work themselves :porky-happy:

    :yes-honey-left: and you'll hire a replacement for the staff you just put on supervising the kiosks, right? right? (they do not)

    • zifnab25 [he/him, any]
      ·
      2 years ago

      I mean, I agree in theory. But also, even before the self-checkout, you always have twice as many kiosks as staff on any given day.

      • Diogenes_Barrel [love/loves]
        ·
        2 years ago

        the fundamental problem is as you pointed out, a refusal to hire sufficient staff. no matter how much labor saving tech they install/offload labor to customers---they just lower the staff and replicate the same structural imbalance. self-checkout doesn't deliver a smoother consumer-end experience, or alleviate pressure on the workers---it just gives management a reason to not have another checker or two. and a way to put a security camera in your face for analytics/surveillance