Fairly sure that is the same person and that hexbear is getting mad at a bit again. At least that means that there were about a dozen chuds falling for it as well, or a couple thousand if some propaganda account accidentally put this on blast.
i racked my mind quite a bit over this cause i took it credulously, and while it could be a joke i think there's a way for it to be approximating "Old Sexy Laura Croft"--"New Unsecy Laura Croft" type discourse, without understanding that different iterations of a game character aren't analogous to the same person in different lights
Fairly sure that is the same person and that hexbear is getting mad at a bit again. At least that means that there were about a dozen chuds falling for it as well, or a couple thousand if some propaganda account accidentally put this on blast.
Or the poster is just capable of that level of cognitive dissonance
i racked my mind quite a bit over this cause i took it credulously, and while it could be a joke i think there's a way for it to be approximating "Old Sexy Laura Croft"--"New Unsecy Laura Croft" type discourse, without understanding that different iterations of a game character aren't analogous to the same person in different lights