I see your point. My intention was to criticize the contrived and constructed advertising images that make up of beauty ideals that many men hold by praising the seemingly candid photo, but my comment lacks any of that viewpoint. It was ill worded.
I've seen worse wording fwiw, it's just missing the forest for the trees I guess, and people did the same on the Sydney Sweeney posts so I guess I just noticed. No big tho...
I see your point. My intention was to criticize the contrived and constructed advertising images that make up of beauty ideals that many men hold by praising the seemingly candid photo, but my comment lacks any of that viewpoint. It was ill worded.
I've seen worse wording fwiw, it's just missing the forest for the trees I guess, and people did the same on the Sydney Sweeney posts so I guess I just noticed. No big tho...