This looks great, but I am skeptical just how they will manage parallel sets of laws that are not territorially defined or somewhat alternately federated. Like, would some industrial concern be able to just pay an indigenous group to say "We don't recognize Santiago's zoning laws and water protection laws" and then use the members of that group for the construction projects and the dumping of mercury in the drinking water? Maybe the collective good clauses would give the tools to get around this, but I am still skeptical how well things can function with multiple people subject to different sets of laws interacting.