• The_Dawn [fae/faer, des/pair]
    ·
    2 years ago

    I feel like this thread from earlier (and my response) is a good response to this one https://hexbear.net/post/217485/comment/2768512

    Well so one big hang-up for me is the blurring of science/technology and magic, both sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic and its converse. But I am just being a nerd there so let’s skip that.
    

    This is such a huge thing though. So many people today don’t want Magic to be Magic. They want a setting that is Magic-Punk. Magic as a technology, as a science, and as a resource.

    What is the point of magic if not an exploration of a reality that is not our own? Why in the hell would mages be content to slave away under the shackles of capitalism? (speaking here of setting where mages are often just more efficient labors, in some settings replacing able-bodied people as the proletarian class entirely!) If these mages are so powerful and common they can constitute an entire working class, then at least be realistic an interesting; the cities would devolve into gang warfare and lawlessness almost immediately. the average worker has guns for hands!!

    I tend to be into fae-wildy, Kind Of Other Dimensions But Incomprehensible To Us, Chaos Magick-y type stuff.

    • RNAi [he/him]
      ·
      2 years ago

      I think they are talking about authors like Gabriel Garcia Marquez and such

    • dung_Eater [none/use name]
      hexagon
      ·
      2 years ago

      fuck yes, this! if there exists a shimmer of another possible world, why doesn't it rupture everything in this fantasy? why the fuck would you write a story that takes new possibilities and shackles them to the horizon of our neo-liberal world??

        • dung_Eater [none/use name]
          hexagon
          ·
          2 years ago

          i know that's the concept, but i think it's an apt name for the genre known as "magical realism". except smug liberals would hate to admit to themselves that their ideology has a choke point

            • Dingdangdog [he/him,comrade/them]
              ·
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              I'm thinking the OP is getting the genre mixed up

              Maybe they meant like gritty fantasy or something lol

              Seems like they're ranting about George RR Martin more than Gabo

              • CriticalOtaku [he/him]
                ·
                2 years ago

                Stuff like The Dresden Files or Vampire: the Masquerade is usually called Urban Fantasy, tho, and we still call Gambo Thrones fantasy.

                Magical realism has a certain literary, postmodernist bent that's kinda distinctive from that, even if the category is too broad to be useful.

    • UlyssesT
      ·
      edit-2
      15 days ago

      deleted by creator

    • robot_dog_with_gun [they/them]
      ·
      2 years ago

      on the other hand if Magic is Magic you have to justify why nobody made an attempt at rigorous study of it and how anybody has learned to do anything with it.

      • Frank [he/him, he/him]
        ·
        2 years ago

        Often it's as simple as magic doesn't have consistent rules that can be rigorously studied, and you just have to rely on vibes and stuff an old dude told you and hope for the best. Also having to ask nature spirits and gods for help and kind of just hoping they like your offering of cigarettes and whisky enough to help you.

        • robot_dog_with_gun [they/them]
          ·
          2 years ago

          Often it’s as simple as magic doesn’t have consistent rules that can be rigorously studied, and you just have to rely on vibes and stuff an old dude told you and hope for the best

          huh i thought we decided deus ex machina sorts of plot contrivances were bad.

          • The_Walkening [none/use name]
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            Why should I automatically think plot contrivance/god from the machine are always bad? They can exist in a story and be okay if the story overall is good/entertaining (though I'll give you that when they're bad, they're pretty bad - e.g. any movie set in the era of telephones that bores you into being aware that major plot points can be solved with a phone call ).

            • robot_dog_with_gun [they/them]
              ·
              2 years ago

              well for one thing we already called it a contrivance.

              god from the machine is bad because it's nakedly from the machine. it's low-effort it's not clever. it's non-s equitur

              like, taste is subjective or whatever, but our hegemonic culture I think rightly disapproves of a writer solving a plot problem by having somebody show up who had nothing to do with the whole rest of the story or having some random event happen.... unless it's carefully done as a subversion of expectations like having some family drama and then they all die in an earthquake and there's some point being made.

    • Mardoniush [she/her]
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I do like it when "Hard-Magic" books do engage with this (this is yet another opportunity for me to plug the Commonweal series for making godlike eldritch magic from beyond hell mostly a branch of Civil/Military Engineering for a revolutionary Socialist state)