it's because it doesn't have HDR. which doesn't work in linux with amd anyway. FUCK NVIDIA :up-yours-woke-moralists:

it's better because it supports MST - the displayport protocol that allows daisychaining. the equivalent 2022 monitor costs double the price lmaoooooo I don't game :hentai-free: and HDR is something I have literally never seen or used so I don't fucking care. I got exactly what I wanted.

  • TheCaconym [any]
    ·
    2 years ago

    Especially displays and graphic cards. Personally I don't give a flying fuck about 4k or whatever, ever since we reached 1920*1080 I've been happy enough and I've stayed there, I barely see a change on higher res anyway.

    • Ericthescruffy [he/him]
      ·
      2 years ago

      4k is such a waste for gaming outside of VR, especially if you don't have displayport or hdmi2.1.

      Keep your fucking pixels. I'd rather play at 120hz.

      • silent_water [she/her]
        hexagon
        ·
        2 years ago

        I prefer 4k but not for gaming pixels. it's cause I want to fit more code on the screen and fonts are noticeably blurry at 1920x1080p. at 4k, I might have to size up my fonts a little but I can fit more on the screen and avoid eyestrain.

        • BlueMagaChud [any]
          ·
          2 years ago

          This is why I like 3440x1440 ultrawide, it's so much screen real estate in 2.35:1 like the film nerds love, obviates multi monitor setups, and it's still fewer pixels to drive than 4k.