Haha I’m gonna sit here and scrape some crust or get all the oil perfectly gone? No, not a chance. I know who put the oil there. I did. It’s simple.
Haha I’m gonna sit here and scrape some crust or get all the oil perfectly gone? No, not a chance. I know who put the oil there. I did. It’s simple.
Yeah I understand the mechanism and science behind induction, but specifically to woks: the wok doesn't stay still.
Excess/"wasted" heat from a gas stove is a flaw that has been explicitly flipped to the advantage of wok cooking. There's a reason why the wok is shaped like that and wok stoves are shaped like that.
This is actually a bad thing for cooking with woks. Woks don't sit flat and just shake back and forth, woks don't sit still while you use a utensils to move the food back and forth. The wok moves and won't stay in contact with the induction burner. There's a Y axis involved. The wok moves upwards, not going to be in constant contact with an electric stove.
This helps impart 镬气, the instantaneous caramelisation of sugars that adds a smoky flavour that you literally cannot recreate by moving ingredients a stationary pan with a wooden spoon or spatula. Wok hei/Huò qì
An instantaneous burst of heat over 1000°C/1800°F followed by rapid cooling from being airborne.
Ah interesting! of course.
Then I'm back to my idea of something like a laboratory heating mantle that stays attached to the wok during cooking. Weight might be a problem though. Kinda defeats the simplicity of a wok if it's riding on some weight assisting mechanism :p
Someone needs to solve this because gas is on the way out one way or the other. Portable burners might be used by enthusiasts in areas without infrastructure or with bans on installations but they're not really a long term solution.
Before natural gas my people used a whole lot of wood.
But if that's not going to be the case, I hear hydrogen is flammable and can be created by putting a current through water. Doesn't even release carbon upon burning. So electric with an extra step?
China has nuclear power so using electricity to generate hydrogen to burn instead of LPG/Butane/Propane/Acetylene might be more carbon friendly if technology is invested. Methane is also a renewable flammable gas but the downside is it's not odourless.
Hydrogen is a promising fuel for many applications, and burning it doesn't destroy air quality. Unfortunately literally every material I've ever checked is pourous to it so storage is very hard, and because of it's pseduo metallic properties it can dissolve into steel and cause it to lose strength. A major problem for pipes/pressure vessels :(. It's possible we'll find some way to sequester it from steel and prevent that problem but idk how likely that is.
I think we'd probably have difficulty supplying modern cities with enough wood, plus environmental regs are tightening in many places and filtering air is expensive.
Methane is actually odourless! usually the gas is scented because people kept dying by leaving methane taps on. It is hard to burn fully to avoid build up of harmful chemicals in poorly ventilated environments.
I wonder about future fuels a fair bit. There are problems with basically everything, it's very frustrating. You can't even say fuck it and just make a plasma flame with arc discharge as you end up putting out UV and ozone and then you die. I guess fuck off powerful radiant heat lamps might work to substitute gas style stoves, although unfortunstely for me I don't see that becoming popular enough in my country to be anything except a rich person thing.