Thinking about how they use the word "genocide" in relation to the idea of getting rid of capitalists, who are an economic power group and cease to be part of that group if their capital and connections to it are taken away.
Like how do you arrive at the point of thinking genocide is a legitimate word to use in that context. I don't get it.
Not to mention that the kind of systematic violence that would prove necessary to liquidate the capitalist class includes at worst the execution of thousands.
Anyone who calls for austerity and cuts to social welfare spending is far more a proponent of genocide than any anti-capitalist; after all, they seek to execute millions.
Thinking about how they use the word "genocide" in relation to the idea of getting rid of capitalists, who are an economic power group and cease to be part of that group if their capital and connections to it are taken away.
Like how do you arrive at the point of thinking genocide is a legitimate word to use in that context. I don't get it.
Not to mention that the kind of systematic violence that would prove necessary to liquidate the capitalist class includes at worst the execution of thousands.
Anyone who calls for austerity and cuts to social welfare spending is far more a proponent of genocide than any anti-capitalist; after all, they seek to execute millions.
Reminds me of this garbage: https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702304549504579316913982034286