So, If I can understand the argument; it's that AI generates art which is lower quality, and isn't necessarily apparent to normal audiences, but it's cost and speed of creation will displace existing artists leading to an a decrease in quality. The decline of traditional artists will break a chain of skill and technique built up over generations, and will be difficult or impossible to ever restore. The AI separates the artwork from the direct human artistic intent artists previously had by default on their work, and this poor quality persists even when human artists manually retouch AI creations, or they start with an Original sketch and use an AI to iterate on it, or both. Additionally, AI is more susceptible to blindly copying and reinforcing trends and biases based on marketability, number previous works, and avoiding controversy, that a human artist would naturally be skeptical of and has an easier time bucking or working consciously around.

Before I start critiquing, Is this an accurate summary of the breadth of AI opponent thought?