Is there even a law against this? Idk... maybe defamation? But that wouldn't count. Maybe revenge porn but it'd really depend on how it was worded, and even then would you be able to do anything if they didn't post it to a public forum?
it's legal but weird to paint or draw what you imagine (or remember, but get over your exes ya losers) somebody would look like nude, I continue to not understand why "using a computer to ____" makes a difference to anyone. I'm sure teens in the 70s were getting a polaroid or yearbook photo of somebody and gluing their face onto some porno mag they found in the woods.
the harm would come if some creep went on to harass somebody, but that's a harassment problem not unique to a slightly more advanced, low-user-skill photoshop.
sharing that shit was always the problem anyway, the problem isn't the 'art' regardless of the subjective quality, the pasted headshot getting passed around a school is probably something that actually happened and the behavior that went along with it afterward was probably bad, but those boys would've been shitty to that girl without the woods porn and glue stick.
nothat makes the thing worse not better, but I'm saying that this is something that already happened and it's not materially different just because it's with a computer and there's less of an ableist barrier to being a creep.
the problem remains the person being harassed on the basis of the doctored image, not the existence of the doctored image.
the problem here is still that it's being shared and that people harass the subject.
opposing these actions is also very easy stance to take, and it's more fundamental than the nude images thing that's only a problem because a bunch of dumbasses have hangups about nudity and would pile on a victim instead of supporting them.
A hurdle is removed that makes it a lot easier for this hedonic/puritan hybrid hellworld we're in to wreck a person (usually a woman)'s career with deepfakes and related technology assisted creeping.
that those dudes would’ve found some other way to ruin those womens’ lives
That's a take straight from :reddit-logo: there, usually to make excuses for old fashioned child porn, cartoon or otherwise. "Child molesters would have done those crimes anyway with the exact same frequency and with just as many offenders. Hedonic treadmill don't real. Normalization don't real."
you’re mad about the wrong thing.
I disagree, and I think your priorities are selfish and misplaced here.
Is there even a law against this? Idk... maybe defamation? But that wouldn't count. Maybe revenge porn but it'd really depend on how it was worded, and even then would you be able to do anything if they didn't post it to a public forum?
it's legal but weird to paint or draw what you imagine (or remember, but get over your exes ya losers) somebody would look like nude, I continue to not understand why "using a computer to ____" makes a difference to anyone. I'm sure teens in the 70s were getting a polaroid or yearbook photo of somebody and gluing their face onto some porno mag they found in the woods.
the harm would come if some creep went on to harass somebody, but that's a harassment problem not unique to a slightly more advanced, low-user-skill photoshop.
deleted by creator
sharing that shit was always the problem anyway, the problem isn't the 'art' regardless of the subjective quality, the pasted headshot getting passed around a school is probably something that actually happened and the behavior that went along with it afterward was probably bad, but those boys would've been shitty to that girl without the woods porn and glue stick.
deleted by creator
nothat makes the thing worse not better, but I'm saying that this is something that already happened and it's not materially different just because it's with a computer and there's less of an ableist barrier to being a creep.
the problem remains the person being harassed on the basis of the doctored image, not the existence of the doctored image.
deleted by creator
the problem here is still that it's being shared and that people harass the subject.
opposing these actions is also very easy stance to take, and it's more fundamental than the nude images thing that's only a problem because a bunch of dumbasses have hangups about nudity and would pile on a victim instead of supporting them.
A hurdle is removed that makes it a lot easier for this hedonic/puritan hybrid hellworld we're in to wreck a person (usually a woman)'s career with deepfakes and related technology assisted creeping.
Removed by mod
So you're saying that revenge porn is almost completely meaningless to you, as are the lives that are affected by it? :what-the-hell:
Removed by mod
That's a take straight from :reddit-logo: there, usually to make excuses for old fashioned child porn, cartoon or otherwise. "Child molesters would have done those crimes anyway with the exact same frequency and with just as many offenders. Hedonic treadmill don't real. Normalization don't real."
I disagree, and I think your priorities are selfish and misplaced here.
cool story bro
Apparently, you want what you want and people hurt by what you want evidently don't matter to you.
what fucking part of this chain has "i want" in it? what the fuck are you talking about?
Disengage.
Removed by mod