And while there were some informative parts, there were some parts I found to be downright biological determinist and reactionary. The first issue I had with it was it seems to want to almost bring back the myth of Teutonism and Anglo Saxonism. it talks about how essential America's British past was and how it was what made America, not the broken backs of minorities and poor people . The second issue I had with it was the chapter on the "borderers" people from the north of England and lowland Scotland as well as Northern Ireland who settled in Appalachia and the Ozarks and are what people call "white trash" today. He basically implies these people were dirtier, dumber and more promiscuous than the rest of the British colonial stock, I won't say it feels racist because these people were largely of white ancestry, but this part of the book feels very classist and elitist.

I'm selling it short i'm sure. I'm not the brightest guy around, but in my gut I could feel why some on the right say this is one of the best books on American history. Because it appeals to that myth of "Anglo Saxon white America" they've got constantly playing in their heads.

Anyone else read this? What did you think?

  • FourteenEyes [he/him]
    ·
    2 years ago

    Heritage is another thing under the broad umbrella of "things people are somehow proud of despite having contributed nothing to and people are somehow okay with that"

    Call me a weirdo but I just don't get it. Proud of family that died before you existed? Proud of your hometown because of a local dish you have never made? Proud of a sports team that's in a city you've never visited? Proud of a country you just kinda live in, your only contribution being taxes that you bitch about constantly? Couldn't be me. Just seems fucking nonsensical. You didn't do anything. You just sort of decided this was a part of your identity and started swelling up your ego like a balloon over it.